![]() ![]() I believe he probably has made sexual advances towards some of the boys he choses to share his personal life with. I think he has a strange obsession with teenage boys, and as stated above, uses his 'Peter Pan' bit to cover his perversions. What did MJ do when he had a problem with Sony Music? Yes, he played out the race card and accused Tommy Motolla to be a racist (never mind that Motolla was married to Mariah Carrey who is half black).Īnd BTW, they are already suggesting that the DA Tom Sneddon is a racist.Īt this stage, I'd not like to lay a bet against him having experience of both!Ĭulpable, yes, guilty, no. I think the race card is more than likely to be played out in this case. I wish they could have a normal family with normal parents. Whether MJ is guilty or not, they don't seem to have a normal childhood and I'd be very surprised if they turned out to be healthy adults with healthy souls. But because he is Michael Jackson, people think: "Oh he is just a big kid, let him do that." This is actually the big deception of this man in my opinion.īTW, I feel sorry for his own kids. I mean if an everyday 45-year-old guy would want to have sleepovers with your son you would have suspecions immediately. Can it be that he is actually hiding his perversity behind his strangeness? I mean he just wants us to beleive he is this "big kid", a little wierd but harmless? But now I look at it from another aspect. I thought: people think he is guilty only because he is different. This is how I felt about him for a long time. I agree that being strange doesn't prove guilt. I don't have the facts. Therefore, I cannot convict him and say that he is guilty. It wouldn't be fair. Michael, is strange.everyone agrees. Being strange doesn't necessarily means that he is a child molester. If he is, then by all means he should be prosecuted. The parents of the victims should be prosecuted as well for being so stupid and careless.  :-\\ It just goes to show that people are willing to put their children in harm's way for the sake of money and fame. Sad. ![]() That podium speech was a big mistake for him, 'cause we now all know that the fairy thing was a big act. I've always been waiting for the right time and place to "call him out" on his charade. But on more than one occasion I've caught him accidentally slipping into a Brooklyn accent. I have a customer who has a distinctive, foreign-sounding name, and he talks with this great Brazilian accent when we do business. If I am right this is an issue of complete CRIMINALITY rather than psychologically-driven criminality. To me, that means that he does NOT have a childlike "personality" and rather, he knows EXACTLY what he has been doing. Normal speech, normal diction, normal mannerisms. He has this public personal that is shown by his childlike behaviour and his fairy-like voice and mannerisms.īut once he got Mesereau as a lawyer, and Mesereau told him that this is not a joke and that he could go to the slammer, he got up to that podium and WALKED and TALKED like a normal person. I am not sure how much of his persona is a "sickness" and how much is just plain old criminality. You know, "Michael, it's great to invite kids to your park for fun, but we don't sleep in the same bed with them." However, when your a multi-multi-millionaire weirdo recluse, you pretty much get to do what you want. It's too bad there wasn't a "responsible adult" who could supervise MJ himself. I also agree with 80sCheerleader, the parents were irresponsible letting their kids go to MJ's unchaperoned, especially after the last round of suspicions. I don't think I could serve on a Wacko Jacko jury. I think he's guilty of something to do with touchy-feely with minors, and possibly providing minors with prescription drugs and alcohol. and if not, should there be a trial at all? My gut feeling is that he's not sexually assaulted any of the boys, but probably does gain some kind of gratification from having them around. I wonder whether the boys concerned have come to any harm (mental more than physical - if it were the latter it would be an open-and-shut case). Still doesn't prove that he's actually molested or harmed any of them in any way: he's certainly a screwed-up kind of character, which isn't exactly surprising given the life he's led, but that doesn't make him a child-molester.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |